Contract review guide

Surrogacy Contract Red Flags Intended Parents Should Review

Use each red flag as a prompt to investigate, clarify or renegotiate. Reading the full document as one system reveals how duties, evidence, payments and consequences work together.

Scales of justice beside legal documents in a bright professional office
From: SurrogacyLawyers.ge legal teamPublished: 4 August 2026Updated: 7 September 2026Last reviewed: 7 September 202612 minute readNino Tatoshvili · Nino Lipartia

The short answer

What this guide helps you decide

The most consequential contract problems often arise from omissions: an unnamed responsible party, a broad exclusion, an undefined payment trigger, incomplete consent or record rules, or no workable plan when treatment, pregnancy, birth or travel changes. Review all incorporated schedules and related agreements together, and obtain jurisdiction-specific advice before signature.

01

Read across documents

A promise in a brochure or message may be narrowed by the agreement, annex, clinic term or payment schedule.

02

Test changed circumstances

The agreement should allocate decisions, costs, notices and records when the expected sequence does not occur.

03

Separate legal systems

A Georgian contract cannot by itself guarantee a foreign parentage, nationality, passport or immigration decision.

Responsibility and service gaps

Begin with the parties and definitions. Each entity that receives money or promises a material service should have a clear role. Watch for a contracting company that describes services delivered entirely by unnamed affiliates, or clauses saying the agency merely introduces providers while the commercial presentation suggests a coordinated end-to-end obligation.

Check hierarchy and incorporation. The agreement should make clear whether a schedule, program rules, website terms, clinic policy or later instruction forms part of the bargain, and what controls if documents conflict. A power to change material terms unilaterally, without notice or a meaningful choice, deserves advice in the context of applicable law and the parties’ status.

  • undefined provider, surrogate, donor, clinic or payment-agent roles;
  • services described as included but absent from the operative scope;
  • broad disclaimers that appear inconsistent with specific promises;
  • important obligations dependent on a third party with no contingency plan;
  • annexes or policies referenced but not supplied before signature.

Payment, refund and unused-fund risks

Every amount should be connected to a recipient, purpose and objectively identifiable trigger. Terms such as administrative fee, coordination cost, reserve, contingency or non-refundable amount need definition. Confirm whether funds are held for future expenses, paid immediately as earned fees or transferred to third parties, and what accounting evidence will be provided.

Refund clauses should address more than total cancellation. Ask what happens after a failed or cancelled stage, participant withdrawal, medical change, provider replacement, delayed performance or unused reserve. A clause that gives one party absolute discretion to decide whether a service was performed or an amount is refundable is not necessarily unenforceable, but it creates a material reliance and dispute risk requiring specific advice.

Payment-clause stress test
ChangeClause to locateEvidence to preserve
Cycle or transfer does not proceedCancellation, rescheduling and repeat-attempt costsClinic confirmation and payment ledger
Participant is replacedReplacement fee and responsibility allocationWritten reason, approvals and new terms
Program ends earlyRefund, earned-fee and unused-fund rulesTermination notice and itemised account
Birth or travel is delayedExtended support and third-party cost clausesOfficial requests, invoices and timeline

Birth, exit and dispute clauses

The agreement should allocate practical preparation for birth registration, supporting medical evidence, certified copies, corrections, translation, apostille or legalization, embassy submissions and travel-document applications. It should also state what is excluded. Language promising a birth certificate, passport or departure by a fixed date should be treated cautiously because competent authorities make those decisions under current law and evidence requirements.

Dispute provisions deserve review before conflict exists. Identify the governing law, notice method, language, negotiation period, court or arbitration forum, interim or urgent options, cost allocation and evidence obligations. A foreign forum or compressed notice deadline may materially affect practical access to a remedy. Do not rely on a dispute clause in isolation; related agreements may select different laws or forums.

Clauses that should trigger focused advice

  • guaranteed parentage, nationality, passport or travel timing;
  • one party’s unrestricted right to change providers, fees or scope;
  • waivers extending beyond what has been explained or can lawfully be waived;
  • conflicting dispute forums across agency, clinic or participant agreements;
  • no process for notices, document correction, records or post-birth cooperation.

Decision framework

Pre-signature red-flag review

Record the clause number, question, response and any agreed amendment instead of relying on memory.

Parties and scope

  • All legal entities and providers identified
  • Complete annexes and controlling-document rule
  • Deliverables, dependencies and exclusions defined
  • Change-control and notice process

Money and treatment

  • Recipient, trigger and purpose for each payment
  • Refund and unused-fund accounting
  • Consent authority and change pathway
  • Confidentiality, records and data-use limits

Birth and enforcement

  • Birth and exit responsibilities without guarantees
  • Foreign-law dependencies identified
  • Governing law, forum and language reviewed
  • Termination, transition and evidence-preservation steps

Official sources and legal limits

These official sources provide the starting point for the planning and contract issues discussed above. Before a client acts, the current Georgian text should be read together with the complete agreements, provider records and any relevant foreign-law advice.

If this is your current issue

Legal help for the next decision

Bring the relevant agreement, provider communication and deadline. The lawyer can then define the document review or coordination actually needed.

Keep preparing

Questions connected with this topic

Review before signature

Test the full document set against the proposed journey

A focused review can identify responsibility gaps, payment exposure, consent issues and cross-border assumptions while amendments may still be possible.